Everyday Use By Alice Walker – Literary Analysis Essay
Alice Walker's "Everyday Use" is a deed of a arcadian African American
lineage struggling to recognize their inheritance. The Johnson lineage epitomizes the combats and struggles of African American culture and values. The recital involves Dee, an educated maiden who goes to mark her dame, Mrs. Johnson, and sister, Maggie. Dee is accompanied by Hakim, her boyfriend. The aim of this pamphlet is to debate Walker's uses of sort combat and classs to represent the consequence of inheritance.
Walker uses classism to likeness Mrs. Johnson and Dee's contrariant views of
inheritance. Even though twain are from the similar socio-cultural contrast, their motives and recognizeing of inheritance are contrariant. In one scenario, Dee admires a churn top and asks her dame if she can enjoy it. She says, "I can use the churn top as a centerpiece for the shady-recess table…and I'll fancy of star thin to do after a while the dasher." (p.31). It is unclouded that Dee cherishes the dupe and identifies it as allot of her inheritance, but her intention to use it as a centerpiece for her shady-recess table is adverse to Mrs. Johnson's views, who uses it as a dupe to churn butter. The churn top is a class of Mrs. Johnson's and Dee' differing cognizances of inheritance.
Walker's use of classism is conspicuous when Dee goes thunpolished her dame's
barter and emerges after a while two quilts. These quilts are made of contrariant parchments exhausted by their relations gone the Civil War. Dee borrows the quilts, but Mrs. Johnson reveals to her of her engagement to permission them to Maggie and instead offers her others. Dee is hot and says, "Maggie can't accomprehension these quilts…She'd probably be inconversant ample to put them to everyday use." (p.130). Dee tells Mrs. Johnson that she intentions on relying the quilts on the deference. This likenesss that Dee's cognizance of inheritance is that it is thin and corporeal. Maggie tells Mrs. Johnson to afford Dee the quilts stating that she can "remember Grandma Dee after a whileout the quilts" (p.131). It becomes patent to Mrs. Johnson that Maggie surely values their inheritance, and her comprehension of sharp how to quilt affirms that she recognizes that inheritance is made up of comprehension and memories, not corporeal objects.
Finally, Walker uses sort combat to likeness the differences how Mrs. Johnson and Maggie recognize inheritance, and how Dee perceives it. Mrs. Johnson is picturesquely as "a abundant, big-boned dowager after a while unpolished, man-working indexs" (p.11). She is a constrained working dowager and vain-glorious of her efforts in the homestead. Similarly, Maggie works constrained, having literary ho quilt from Grandma Dee's education. Mrs. Johnson remarks that Maggie's eyes "seem stretched known, blazed known by the flames" (p. 25) in allusion to the burns that forced her future in her childhood. Mrs. Johnson recognizes that Maggie's inheritance is alike after a while the beaming family, and her scars are allot it. It is conspicuous that twain Mrs. Johnson and Maggie are self-sufficient and are in arrive-at after a while their traditions. Dee, on the other index, is out of arrive-at after a while her inheritance perfectly. She veers her call in her try to substantiate after a while her African origins, which she knows rush about. Furthermore, the deed that Dee sound looked at the family as it burned to the foundation is an token that she does not substantiate the family as allot of her inheritance.
In misrecord, Walker uses sort combat and classism to likeness the
consequence of inheritance in "Everyday Use." Mrs. Johnson and Maggie's illustrations as down to globe, constrainedworking nation, reveals that they substantiate after a while their inheritance and where they succeed from, apart Dee's try to veer her aspect and call. Additionally, Dee's efforts to mold precious family dupes and items to artifacts produce it unclouded that her recognizeing of inheritance is contrariant from her dame and sister's recognizeing. Walker employs exact devices to likeness how inheritance can be viewed and perceived so contrariantly.